Interesting. It's the "order" that I wonder about, as that would essentially be using the threat of violence to force people to support an activity of which they disapprove (if they don't comply they will have their money taken or will be arrested and jailed). Do you think that at all immoral?
no subject
Date: January 9th, 2007 04:21 pm (UTC)From:It's the "order" that I wonder about, as that would essentially be using the threat of violence to force people to support an activity of which they disapprove (if they don't comply they will have their money taken or will be arrested and jailed). Do you think that at all immoral?